In such a case

marriage Proposition 8: "If it's just about the label, you can tell a child that someone has to be their friend. They may say they are a friend, but you are changing the meaning of the label."At the heart of the case, then, is the question of whether a constitutional right to same-sex marriage is just another step on a steady road to equality for all, or a sharp turn into what Justice Anthony M. Kennedy called "uncharted waters." Charles Cooper, representing the supporters of Prop 8, warned that there may be monsters ahead: "The Plaintiffs' expert acknowledged that redefining marriage will have real-world consequences,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and that it is impossible for anyone to foresee the future accurately enough to know exactly what those real-world consequences would be. And among those real-world consequences,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Your Honor, we would suggest are adverse consequences." In such a case, he argued, "it would hardly be irrational" for California voters to say, "I think its better for California

The post has been approved 0 times